Persons have equal employment opportunities at the University of Alaska based
solely upon their qualifications and demonstrated ability or demonstrated
potential ability.
The University of Alaska affirms its commitment to principles of
nondiscrimination in the hiring and employment of all persons of legal employment
status regardless of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, citizenship,
pregnancy, childbirth or related medical conditions, marital status, changes
in marital status, disability, age, status as a disabled veteran or Vietnam
era veteran.
Each major administrative unit will have a written Affirmative Action Plan
which sets forth specific affirmative action responsibilities. Hiring authorities
will make affirmative efforts to recruit and employ qualified people who
are members of "protected classes" presently under-represented.
Methods of recruiting, screening and selection will be documented and be
approved by the AAO or the regional personnel office, as determined by the
president or chancellor as appropriate, prior to recruitment.
| A. |
Discrimination
| 1. |
Prohibition Against Discrimination
| a. |
Discrimination is a form of misconduct which undermines the integrity of
the working and learning environment and will not be tolerated on or at
University of Alaska premises or functions.
|
| b. |
Subject to the constraints of Regents' Policy, the broadest range of legally
permissible speech and expression will be tolerated in the learning environment,
student and scholarly publications, and at public forums open to public debate
and the exchange of ideas.
|
|
| 2. |
Definitions
| a. |
"Discrimination" refers to being adversely treated or affected, either
intentionally or unintentionally, in a manner that unlawfully differentiates
or makes distinctions on the basis of an individual's legally protected status
or on some basis other than an individual's qualifications, abilities, and
performance, as appropriate.
|
| b. |
"Learning Environment" is defined as the premises of the University of Alaska
system or any site where educational programs and activities are conducted
in the name of the University of Alaska or any unit thereof.
|
| c. |
"Affirmative Action Officer" refers to the regional affirmative action director
or designee.
|
| d. |
"Regional Personnel Officer" refers to the regional human resource or personnel
director or manager or designee.
|
| e. |
"Working Environment" is defined as any place where the business of the
university is conducted in the name of the University of Alaska or any unit
thereof.
|
| f. |
"Investigator(s)" are defined as the person or persons who have the
responsibility and authority to conduct an investigation of formal discrimination
complaints.
|
| g. |
"Advisors" are defined as individuals appointed from each MAU to advise
individuals regarding discrimination, provide information on whom to contact
to file a formal complaint, and outline alternatives for complaint resolution.
The president and the chancellors or their designees will appoint and make
available a list of university personnel to serve as discrimination prevention
advisors for individuals with questions or complaints involving discrimination.
Advisors must have knowledge of applicable law and Regents' Policy and University
Regulation.
|
|
| 3. |
Roles and Responsibilities
| a. |
The University administration is responsible for promoting a positive working
and learning environment where all persons are free to discuss any problems
or questions they may have concerning discrimination at the university, without
fear of intimidation or reprisal.
|
| b. |
All university employees are responsible for maintaining a positive working
and learning environment. Supervisors and faculty will promptly respond to
complaints of discrimination to determine what, if any, remedial action may
be warranted. In resolving these complaints, supervisors and faculty will
seek advice and guidance from the affirmative action officer or advisors.
University employees and students must cooperate fully with efforts to resolve
complaints brought to their attention.
|
|
| 4. |
Informal Resolution Process
The purpose of informal resolution is to educate and inform individuals of
their offensive behavior and to allow individuals the opportunity to voluntarily
correct inappropriate behavior without disciplinary action. Informal resolution
will not generally have as an outcome written reports or sanctions.
| a. |
A complainant generally should try to inform the person directly that his
or her behavior is unwelcome, harmful or offensive. The complainant is also
encouraged to request assistance from other university employees, regional
personnel officers, advisors or affirmative action officers in the informal
resolution of a complaint. These assistants will promptly attempt to resolve
the complaint through consultation and guidance of the complainant or, as
appropriate, mediation between all concerned parties. Successful resolution
efforts will be greatly facilitated by the timely reporting and handling
of complaints.
|
| b. |
Informal resolution may include informing the person about the behavior and/or
writing a letter concerning the behavior and requesting that the behavior
be stopped.
|
| c. |
If informal resolution efforts fail to achieve satisfactory results, or if
informal resolution is inappropriate in consideration of the circumstances
or the egregious nature of the alleged behavior, the complainant may file
a formal complaint with the affirmative action officer or the regional personnel
officer as the initial action.
|
|
| 5. |
Formal Resolution Process
The formal resolution process is an administrative remedy which requires
an investigation and written findings. Generally two investigators will be
designated to conduct a timely investigation to ensure an objective review
of the allegations. The statements of the complainant, respondent and witnesses
become part of a written record which will be used for administrative review
and action as necessary.
| a. |
Formal complaints alleging discrimination must be in writing and include
the following information:
| (1) |
The names of the respondent and complainant.
|
| (2) |
Their affiliation to the university.
|
| (3) |
A description of the offensive behavior and circumstances.
|
|
| b. |
A formal complaint should also include the following information:
| (1) |
A description of any attempts to resolve the problem informally.
|
| (2) |
An explanation of the impact on the complainant.
|
| (3) |
Specific remedies requested.
|
|
| c. |
The investigator(s), in determining whether the alleged conduct constitutes
discrimination, must give consideration, to the record as a whole, to the
totality of the circumstances, and where applicable to regulatory guidelines.
|
| d. |
A copy of the written findings will be distributed to the complainant, the
respondent, the respondent's supervisor, the regional personnel officer,
the office of General Counsel and the Statewide Office of Human Resources.
|
| e. |
Any person who:
| (1) |
commits discrimination; or
|
| (2) |
fails to perform his or her investigatory or supervisory responsibilities;
or
|
| (3) |
makes false claims or provides false testimony against another
|
will be subject to appropriate disciplinary action including, but not limited
to, verbal and written reprimands, probation, suspension or termination.
|
| f. |
When a preponderance of the evidence is found to substantiate a complaint,
disciplinary action may be taken. In determining what disciplinary action
may be appropriate, the extent to which the respondent knew or reasonably
should have known that his or her conduct was harmful or offensive will be
considered. Sanctions for conduct will be based upon all facts and circumstances
of each case.
|
| g. |
A complainant or respondent who disputes the written findings of the
investigation report may request a formal review of the findings within 5
working days of the release of the findings.
Such formal review will be conducted by trained individuals appointed by
the chancellor or, in the case of statewide employees, the president. The
purpose of this review is to provide an opportunity for the chancellor or
president to obtain an objective review of the investigation findings when
those findings are disputed by one of the involved parties.
The review will be scheduled as soon as practicable and the written
recommendation resulting from the review will be forwarded to the chancellor
to the president for a decision.
|
| h. |
If a party is dissatisfied with a chancellor's decision, that party may request
a discretionary review by the president. If the president elects to review
a chancellor's decision, the president's decision will be the final decision
of the university. If the president does not elect to accept a review within
15 working days, the decision of the chancellor then becomes the final decision
of the university. In the case of Statewide Administration employees, the
decision of the president is the final decision of the university. In either
case, the final decision of the university is not grievable except as set
forth in this regulation and is subject to appeal within 30 days pursuant
to Alaska Appellate Rule 602(a)(2).
|
|
| 6. |
Identity of Complainant
The university will not accept complaints when the complainant cannot be
identified to the investigative officer.
Complaints by individuals who refuse to be identified to the respondent will
not be accepted for investigation unless, in the discretion of the university,
persistent and pervasive allegations of discrimination warrant formal
investigation. Whenever formal disciplinary action may be contemplated, alleged
offenders will be advised of the identity of their accusers, the nature of
the charges being brought against them, and the circumstances of the alleged
offense(s).
|
| 7. |
Confidentiality
Investigators will make reasonable efforts to preserve the confidentiality
of their investigation and resolution efforts but cannot guarantee anonymity
to complaining parties or witnesses. University employees and students will
make a reasonable effort to protect the legitimate privacy interests of all
concerned parties.
|
| 8. |
Retaliation
| a. |
All persons have the right to complain about any conduct which they reasonably
believe constitutes discrimination. No university official may take disciplinary
or other adverse action against a person who genuinely but mistakenly believes
himself or herself to be discriminated against, even if the practices complained
of do not, in fact, constitute discrimination.
|
| b. |
Threats or other forms of intimidation or retaliation against complainants,
respondents, witnesses or investigators will constitute a violation of this
regulation and may be subject to separate administrative action, including
termination for cause.
|
|
| 9. |
Bargaining Unit Employees
| a. |
If disciplinary action may result from an investigation of a bargaining unit
employee alleged to have engaged in discrimination, the employee has a right
to union representation during an investigatory interview with the employee.
|
| b. |
Bargaining unit employees who have been disciplined pursuant to this regulation
must resolve their disputes through the dispute resolution processes provided
in their collective bargaining agreement.
|
|
| 10. |
Training programs on discrimination will be designed to:
| a. |
provide employees with current information on federal and state law, Regents'
Policy, University Regulation, and administrative procedures; and
|
| b. |
demonstrate appropriate techniques for the resolution of discrimination
allegations.
|
|
| 11. |
Dissemination
The university administration will make reasonable efforts to inform members
of the university community regarding the prohibition against discriminating
conduct. In particular, this information will be communicated to new employees
as an integral part of their orientation experience.
|
|
| B. |
Sexual Harassment
| 1. |
University Prohibition Against Sexual Harassment
| a. |
Sexual harassment is a form of employee or student misconduct which undermines
the integrity of the working and learning environment and will not be tolerated
on or at University of Alaska premises or functions.
|
| b. |
Subject to the constraints of Regents' Policy, the broadest range of legally
permissible speech and expression will be tolerated in the learning environment,
student and scholarly publications, and at public forums open to public debate
and the exchange of ideas.
|
|
| 2. |
Definitions
| a. |
"Sexual Harassment" includes, but is not limited to, unwelcome sexual advances,
requests for sexual favors, or other verbal or physical conduct of a sexual
nature where:
| (1) |
submission to such conduct is made, either explicitly or implicitly, a term
or condition of an individual's employment or education; or
|
| (2) |
submission to or rejection of such conduct by an individual is used as the
basis for employment or academic decisions affecting that individual; or
|
| (3) |
such conduct has the purpose or necessary effect of unreasonably interfering
with an individual's work or creating a hostile, intimidating or offensive
working or learning environment; and
| (a) |
such conduct is known by the offender to be unwelcome, harmful or offensive;
or
|
| (b) |
a person of average sensibilities would clearly understand the behavior or
conduct is unwelcome, harmful or offensive.
|
|
|
| b. |
"Learning Environment" is defined as the premises of the University of Alaska
system or any site where educational programs and activities are conducted
in the name of the University of Alaska or any unit thereof.
|
| c. |
"Affirmative Action Officer" refers to the regional affirmative action director
or designee.
|
| d. |
"Regional Personnel Officer" refers to the regional human resource or personnel
director or manager or designee.
|
| e. |
"Working Environment" is defined as any place where the business of the
university is conducted in the name of the University of Alaska or any unit
thereof.
|
| f. |
"Investigator(s)" are defined as the person or persons who have the
responsibility and authority to conduct an investigation of formal sexual
harassment complaints.
|
| g. |
"Advisors" are defined as individuals appointed from each MAU to advise
individuals regarding sexual harassment, provide information on whom to contact
to file a formal complaint, and outline alternatives for complaint resolution.
The president and the chancellors or their designees will appoint and make
available a list of university personnel to serve as harassment prevention
advisors for individuals with questions or complaints involving sexual
harassment. Advisors must have knowledge of sexual harassment law and Regents'
Policy and University Regulation.
|
|
| 3. |
Roles and Responsibilities
| a. |
The university administration is responsible for promoting a positive working
and learning environment where all persons are free to discuss any problems
or questions they may have concerning sexual harassment at the university,
without fear of intimidation or reprisal.
|
| b. |
All university employees are responsible for maintaining a positive working
and learning environment. Supervisors and faculty will promptly respond to
complaints of sexual harassment to determine what, if any, remedial action
may be warranted. In resolving sexual harassment complaints, supervisors
and faculty will seek advice and guidance from the affirmative action officer
or harassment prevention advisors. University employees and students must
cooperate fully with efforts to resolve complaints brought to their attention.
|
|
| 4. |
Informal Resolution Process
The purpose of informal resolution is to educate and inform individuals of
their offensive behavior and to allow individuals the opportunity to voluntarily
correct inappropriate behavior without disciplinary action. Informal resolution
will not generally have as an outcome written reports or sanctions.
| a. |
A complainant generally should try to inform the person directly that his
or her behavior is unwelcome, harmful or offensive. The complainant is also
encouraged to request assistance from other university employees, regional
personnel officers, advisors or affirmative action officers in the informal
resolution of a complaint.
These assistants will promptly attempt to resolve the complaint through
consultation and guidance of the complainant or, as appropriate, mediation
between all concerned parties. Successful resolution efforts will be greatly
facilitated by the timely reporting and handling of complaints.
|
| b. |
Informal resolution may include informing the person about the behavior and/or
writing a letter concerning the behavior and requesting that the behavior
be stopped.
|
| c. |
If informal resolution efforts fail to achieve satisfactory results, or if
informal resolution is inappropriate in consideration of the circumstances
or the egregious nature of the alleged behavior, the complainant may file
a formal complaint with the affirmative action officer or the regional personnel
officer as the initial action.
|
|
| 5. |
Formal Resolution Process
The formal resolution is an administrative remedy which requires an investigation
and written findings. Generally, two investigators will be designated to
conduct a timely investigation to insure an objective review of the allegations.
The statements of the complainant, respondent and witnesses become part of
a written record which will be used for administrative review and action
as necessary.
| a. |
Formal complaints alleging sexual harassment must be in writing and include
the following information:
| (1) |
The names of the respondent and complainant.
|
| (2) |
Their affiliation to the university.
|
| (3) |
A description of the offensive behavior and circumstances.
|
|
| b. |
A formal complaint should also include the following information:
| (1) |
A description of any attempts to resolve the problem informally.
|
| (2) |
An explanation of the impact on the complainant.
|
| (3) |
Specific remedies requested.
|
|
| c. |
The investigator(s), in determining whether the alleged conduct constitutes
sexual harassment, must give consideration to the record as a whole, to the
totality of the circumstances, and to regulatory guidelines where applicable.
|
| d. |
A copy of the written findings will be distributed to the complainant, the
respondent, the respondent's supervisor, the regional personnel officer,
the office of General Counsel and the Statewide Office of Human Resources.
|
| e. |
Any person who:
| (1) |
commits sexual harassment; or
|
| (2) |
fails to perform his or her investigatory or supervisory responsibilities;
or
|
| (3) |
makes false claims or provides false testimony against another
|
will be subject to appropriate disciplinary action including, but not limited
to, verbal and written reprimands, probation, suspension or termination.
|
| f. |
When a preponderance of the evidence is found to substantiate a complaint
of sexual harassment, disciplinary action may be taken. In determining what
disciplinary action may be appropriate, the extent to which the respondent
knew or reasonably should have known that his or her conduct was harmful
or offensive will be considered. Sanctions for conduct will be based upon
all facts and circumstances of each case. Coercive behavior, such as threats
or promises that academic or employment reprisals or rewards will follow
the refusal or granting of sexual favors, constitutes gross misconduct and
provides just cause for immediate termination.
|
| g. |
A complainant or respondent who disputes the written findings of the
investigation report may request a formal review of the findings within 5
working days of the release of the findings. Such formal review will be conducted
by trained individuals appointed by the chancellor or, in the case of statewide
employees, the president. The purpose of this review is to provide an opportunity
for the chancellor or president to obtain an objective review of the
investigation findings when those findings are disputed by one of the involved
parties.
The review will be scheduled as soon as practicable and the written
recommendation resulting from the review will be forwarded to the chancellor
or president for a decision.
|
| h. |
If a party is dissatisfied with a chancellor's decision, that party may request
a discretionary review by the president. If the president elects to review
a chancellor's decision, the president's decision will be the final decision
of the university. If the president does not elect to accept a review within
15 working days, the decision of the chancellor then becomes the final decision
of the university. In the case of Statewide Administration employees, the
decision of the president is the final decision of the university. In either
case, the final decision of the university is not grievable except as set
forth in this regulation and is subject to appeal within 30 days pursuant
to Alaska Appellate Rule 602(a)(2).
|
|
| 6. |
Identity of Complainant
The university will not accept complaints when the complainant cannot be
identified to the investigative officer. Complaints by individuals who refuse
to be identified to the respondent will not be accepted for investigation
unless, in the discretion of the university, persistent and pervasive allegations
of sexual harassment warrant formal investigation. Whenever formal disciplinary
action may be contemplated, alleged offenders will be advised of the identity
of their accusers, the nature of the charges being brought against them,
and the circumstances of the alleged offense(s).
|
| 7. |
Confidentiality
Investigators will make reasonable efforts to preserve the confidentiality
of their investigation and resolution efforts but cannot guarantee anonymity
to complaining parties or witnesses. University employees and students will
make a reasonable effort to protect the legitimate privacy interests of all
concerned parties consistent with their obligation to inform the accused.
|
| 8. |
Retaliation
| a. |
All persons have the right to complain about any conduct which they reasonably
believe constitutes sexual harassment. No university official may take
disciplinary or other adverse action against a person who genuinely but
mistakenly believes himself or herself to be harassed, even if the practices
complained of do not, in fact, constitute sexual harassment.
|
| b. |
Threats or other forms of intimidation or retaliation against complainants,
respondents, witnesses or investigators will constitute a violation of this
regulation and may be subject to separate administrative action, including
termination for cause.
|
|
| 9. |
Bargaining Unit Employees
| a. |
If disciplinary action may result from an investigation of a bargaining unit
employee alleged to have engaged in sexual harassment, the employee has a
right to union representation during an investigatory interview with the
employee.
|
| b. |
Bargaining unit employees who have been disciplined pursuant to this regulation
must resolve their disputes through the dispute resolution processes provided
in their collective bargaining agreement.
|
|
| 10. |
Training programs on sexual harassment will be designed to:
| a. |
provide employees with current information on federal and state law, Regents'
Policy, University Regulation, and administrative procedures; and
|
| b. |
demonstrate appropriate techniques for the resolution of sexual harassment
allegations.
|
|
| 11. |
Dissemination
The university administration will make reasonable efforts to inform members
of the university community regarding the prohibition against sexually harassing
conduct. In particular, this information will be communicated to new employees
as an integral part of their orientation experience.
|
|
| C. |
Consensual Sexual Relationships
| 1. |
Faculty-Student Relationships
| a. |
Within the instructional context: It is considered a serious breach of
professional ethics for a member of the faculty to initiate or acquiesce
in a sexual relationship with a student who is enrolled in a course being
taught by the faculty member or whose academic work, including work as a
teaching assistant, is being supervised by the faculty member.
|
| b. |
Outside the instructional context: Sexual relationships between faculty members
and students occurring outside the instructional context may lead to
difficulties, particularly when the faculty member and student are in the
same academic unit or in units that are academically allied; relationships
that the parties view as consensual may appear to others to be exploitative.
Further, in such situations the faculty member may face serious conflicts
of interest and should be careful to distance himself or herself from any
decisions that may reward or penalize the student involved.
|
|
| 2. |
Supervisor-Employee Relationships
Consensual sexual relationships between supervisors and employees, including
circumstances where a staff member has authority or control over a student's
living or learning environment, are prohibited.
A staff member who fails to withdraw from participation in activities or
decisions that may reward or penalize an employee or student with whom the
staff member has or has had a sexual relationship will be deemed to have
violated his or her ethical obligation to the employee or student, to other
employees or students, to colleagues, and to the university.
|
|
| 3. |
Complaint Procedure
Complaints alleging a violation of the Consensual Sexual Relationships regulation
will be handled in accordance with the regulation regarding sexual harassment.
|
See Regents' Policy 04.02.030.
Policy 04.02.040 regarding drug-free workplace prohibits the unlawful
manufacture, distribution, dispensing, possession, or use by an employee
of a controlled substance in any workplace of the university. The following
steps will be taken to provide a drug-free workplace.
| A. |
Definitions
For purposes of this regulation, the following definitions apply:
| 1. |
"Alcohol" means the intoxicating agent in beverage alcohol, ethyl alcohol,
or other low molecular weight alcohols including methyl and isopropyl alcohol.
|
| 2. |
"Alcohol use (or use alcohol)" means any consumption of any beverage, mixture,
or preparation, including any medication, containing alcohol.
|
| 3. |
"Alcohol concentration" is the alcohol in a volume of breath expressed in
terms of grams of alcohol per 210 liters of breath as indicated by an evidential
breath test.
|
| 4. |
"Commerce" means 1) any trade, traffic or transportation within the jurisdiction
of the United States between a place in a state and a place outside of such
state, including a place outside of the United States and 2) trade, traffic,
and transportation in the United States which affects any trade, traffic,
and transportation described in subsection 1) of this section.
|
| 5. |
"Commercial motor vehicle" or "CMV" means a motor vehicle or combination
of motor vehicles used in commerce to transport passengers or property if
the motor vehicle
| a. |
has a gross combination weight rating of 26,001 or more pounds inclusive
of a towed unit with a gross vehicle weight rating of more than 10,000 pounds;
or
|
| b. |
has a gross vehicle weight rating of 26,001 or more pounds; or
|
| c. |
is designed to transport 16 or more passengers, including the driver; or
|
| d. |
is of any size and is used in the transportation of materials found to be
hazardous for the purposes of the Hazardous Materials Transportation Act
and which require the motor vehicle to be placarded under federal hazardous
materials regulations.
|
|
| 6. |
"Confirmation test," in Controlled Substance testing, is a second analytical
procedure to identify the presence of specific drug or metabolite that is
independent of the screening test and that uses a different technique and
chemical principle from that of the screening test in order to ensure reliability
and accuracy. In alcohol testing, it is a second test, following a screening
test with a result of 0.02 or greater, that provides quantitative data of
alcohol concentration.
|
| 7. |
"Controlled Substance" means marijuana, cocaine, opiates, amphetamines and
phencyclidine.
|
| 8. |
"Covered Employee" or "Employee" means any University of Alaska employee
required to hold a CDL as a function of their employment. This includes for
purposes of pre- employment testing only, applicants and current employees
selected for employment in such a position. A Covered Employee may be off-duty,
on-duty, pre-duty or "on call" status.
|
| 9. |
"Driver" means any Covered Employee who operates a CMV. This includes, but
is not limited to: full-time, regularly employed drivers, casual, intermittent,
temporary, part-time, or occasional drivers.
|
| 10. |
"Driving Time" means all time spent at the driving controls of a CMV in
operation.
|
| 11. |
"Medical Review Officer" is a licensed physician responsible for receiving
laboratory results generated by the University's controlled substance testing
program who has knowledge of substance abuse disorders and has appropriate
medical training to interpret and evaluate a Covered Employee's confirmed
positive test result together with his/her medical history and any other
relevant biomedical information.
|
| 12. |
"Observer" a trained supervisor or other trained university official.
|
| 13. |
"Performing a Safety-Sensitive Function" a Covered Employee is considered
to be performing a Safety-Sensitive Function during any period in which he
or she is actually performing, ready to perform, or immediately available
to perform any Safety-Sensitive Functions.
|
| 14. |
"Safety-Sensitive Function" means:
| a. |
All time a Covered Employee is at a carrier or shipper plant, terminal, facility,
or other property, or on any public property, waiting to be dispatched, unless
the Covered Employee has been relieved from duty by the Covered Employee's
supervisor.
|
| b. |
All time the Covered Employee is inspecting equipment as required by DOT
regulations or otherwise inspecting, servicing, or conditioning any CMV at
any time.
|
| c. |
All driving time as defined in the term driving time in this regulation.
|
| d. |
All time, other than driving time, in or upon any CMV except time spent resting
in a sleeper berth as sleeper berth is defined by DOT regulations.
|
| e. |
All time a Covered Employee is loading or unloading or supervising or assisting
in the loading or unloading of a CMV, attending a CMV being loaded or unloaded,
remaining in readiness to operate the CMV, or in giving or receiving receipts
for shipments loaded or unloaded.
|
| f. |
All time spent by a Covered Employee performing the driver requirements of
DOT regulations relating to accidents.
|
| g. |
All time spent by a Covered Employee repairing, obtaining assistance, or
remaining in attendance upon a disabled CMV.
|
|
| 15. |
"Screening test (or initial test)", in controlled substance testing, is an
immunoassay screen to eliminate "negative" urine specimens from further analysis.
In alcohol testing, an analytic procedure to determine whether an employee
may have a prohibited concentration of alcohol in a breath specimen.
|
| 16. |
"Substance Abuse Professional" means a licensed physician or a licensed or
certified psychologist, social worker, employee assistance professional,
or addiction counselor (certified by the National Association of Alcoholism
and Drug Abuse Counselors Certification Commission) with knowledge of and
clinical experience in the diagnosis and treatment of alcohol and controlled
substances-related disorders.
|
|
| B. |
Applicability
This regulation applies to all University of Alaska employees who are required
to hold a CDL as a function of their university employment ("Covered Employees").
|
| C. |
Prohibitions
It is a violation of this regulation for a Covered Employee to:
| 1. |
Report or return to work within four hours after using alcohol;
|
| 2. |
Use alcohol on the job, including during breaks or meals;
|
| 3. |
Possess alcohol on the job, including during breaks or meals;
|
| 4. |
Have a confirmation test result indicating an alcohol concentration of 0.02
or greater;
|
| 5. |
Use alcohol within eight hours following an accident or until the Covered
Employee is tested, whichever occurs first;
|
| 6. |
Report for duty or remain on duty when the Covered Employee is using or has
used any controlled substance (except when the use is pursuant to the
instructions of a physician who has advised the employee that the substance
does not adversely affect the employee's ability to safely perform a
Safety-Sensitive Function, including operating a Commercial Motor Vehicle
(CMV);
|
| 7. |
Test positive for a controlled substance;
|
| 8. |
Refuse to submit to an alcohol or controlled substance test as required by
federal laws or regulations or this regulation.
|
If a Covered Employee engages in the conduct described above, the employee
is considered to have engaged in Prohibited Conduct, is immediately disqualified
from performing a Safety-Sensitive Function, including operating a CMV, and
is subject to disciplinary action as set forth in Section I of this regulation.
|
| D. |
Required Tests
A Covered Employee is required to submit to alcohol and controlled substance
testing under the circumstances set forth in this section. Before performing
a test, the trained supervisor or other trained University official will
notify the employee that the test is being performed pursuant to the United
States Department of Transportation (DOT) regulations and at no cost to the
employee.
| 1. |
Pre-Employment Testing
For the purposes of pre-employment testing only, "Covered Employee" includes
applicants and current employees selected for employment in such a position.
Prior to the first time a Covered Employee performs Safety-Sensitive Functions
for the University, the employee will undergo testing for alcohol and controlled
substances. No Covered Employee will be allowed to perform Safety-Sensitive
Functions unless the employee has been administered an alcohol test with
a result indicating an alcohol concentration less than 0.02 and has received
a controlled substances test indicating a verified negative test result.
The applicable regional personnel office will obtain, pursuant to a Covered
Employee's consent, information on the employee's alcohol tests with a
concentration result of 0.04 or greater, positive controlled substances test
results, and refusals to be tested, within the preceding two years, which
are maintained by the employee's previous employers. This information must
be obtained and reviewed by the applicable regional personnel office no later
than 14 calendar days after the first time a Covered Employee performs Safety-
Sensitive Functions for the university, if it is not feasible to obtain the
information prior to the employee performing Safety-Sensitive Functions.
A Covered Employee will not be allowed to perform Safety- Sensitive Functions
more than 14 days without obtaining the information.
A Covered Employee will not be allowed to perform Safety- Sensitive Functions
if the university obtains information showing an alcohol test with a
concentration of 0.04 or greater, or a verified positive controlled substances
test result, or refusal to be tested, unless the applicable regional personnel
office obtains information on the employee's subsequent Substance Abuse
Professional evaluation and associated successful return to duty testing.
|
| 2. |
Reasonable Suspicion Testing
A Covered Employee will submit to an alcohol and/or controlled substance
test when a trained supervisor or other trained university official "Observer"
has reasonable suspicion to believe that the employee has engaged in Prohibited
Conduct, except for the conduct prohibited by Section C.3. of this regulation.
A determination that reasonable suspicion exists must be based on specific,
contemporaneous, articulable observations concerning the appearance, behavior,
speech or body odors of the employee. The observations must be made during,
just preceding, or just after the period of the work day that the employee
is performing a Safety-Sensitive Function. The observations may include
indications of the chronic and withdrawal effects of controlled substances.
The Observer must attempt to find another trained supervisor or other trained
university official to corroborate the observations in writing. The Observer
must then escort the employee to the designated collection or test site.
If an alcohol test required by this section is not administered within two
hours following the reasonable suspicion determination, the Observer will
prepare a report stating the reasons the alcohol test was not timely
administered; if the alcohol test is not administered within eight hours
following the reasonable suspicion determination, there will be no further
attempts to administer the test and the Observer will prepare a report stating
the reasons why the test was not timely administered. The report(s) will
be forwarded to the applicable regional personnel office.
A written record of the observations leading to a controlled substance reasonable
suspicion test will be made by the Observer within 24 hours of the observed
behavior or before the results of the controlled substance tests are released,
whichever is earlier.
If an Observer is unable to obtain a reasonable suspicion alcohol test the
Covered Employee may not remain on or return to duty if the employee appears
to be under the influence or impaired by alcohol as indicated by specific,
contemporaneous, articulable observations concerning the appearance, behavior,
speech or body odors of the employee. In this situation, the employee will
only be permitted to return to work when:
| a. |
an alcohol test shows a concentration of less than 0.02; or
|
| b. |
twenty-four hours have elapsed since the reasonable suspicion observations.
|
|
| 3. |
Post-Accident Testing
As soon as practicable following an accident involving a CMV, a Covered Employee
who was performing a Safety- Sensitive Function with respect to the CMV must
be tested for alcohol and controlled substances if:
| a. |
there was a death involved; or
|
| b. |
the employee received a citation for a moving traffic violation arising from
the accident.
|
If an alcohol test is not administered within two hours following the accident,
the Covered Employee's supervisor will prepare a report stating the reasons
why the test was not timely administered. If an alcohol test is not administered
within eight hours following the accident, there will be no further attempts
to administer the test and the Covered Employee's supervisor will prepare
a report stating the reasons why the test was not timely administered.
If a controlled substance test is not administered within 32 hours following
the accident, there will be no further attempts to administer the test and
the Covered Employee's supervisor will prepare a report stating the reasons
why the test was not timely administered. The report(s) will be forwarded
to the applicable regional personnel office. A Covered Employee who is subject
to post-accident testing must remain readily available for the testing, or
will be deemed to have refused to submit for testing. The applicable regional
personnel office will ensure that each Covered Employee receives necessary
information, procedures and instructions prior to performing a Safety-Sensitive
Function, including operating a CMV, so that the employee is able to comply
with the requirements of this Section.
|
| 4. |
Random Testing
The random testing of Covered Employees will be unannounced, spread reasonably
throughout the year, and will be conducted to assure that all Covered Employees
have an equal chance of being tested. The Covered Employees to be tested
will be randomly selected using a scientifically valid method.
The minimum annual percentage rate for random alcohol testing is 25 percent
of the average number of Covered Employees or such other rate as may be set
annually by the Federal Highway Administration. The minimum annual percentage
rate for random controlled substances testing is 50 percent of the average
number of Covered Employees or such other rate as may be set annually by
the Federal Highway Administration.
Upon request by a supervisor, a Covered Employee must immediately proceed
to the designated collection or test site. A Covered Employee may only be
tested for alcohol while the employee is performing a Safety-Sensitive Function,
just before the employee is to perform a Safety-Sensitive Function, or just
after the employee has ceased performing such function.
|
| 5. |
Return-To-Duty Testing
When a Covered Employee has engaged in Prohibited Conduct, the employee will
be permitted to return to work in accordance with the following procedures:
| a. |
The employee will receive a mandatory referral to the University's Employee
Assistance Program for an evaluation by a Substance Abuse Professional who
will determine what assistance, if any, the employee needs in resolving problems
associated with alcohol misuse and controlled substance use; and
|
| b. |
If the employee is identified as needing assistance and a rehabilitation
program has been prescribed, the employee must be evaluated by the Substance
Abuse Professional to determine that the employee has properly followed the
recommended rehabilitation program; and
|
| c. |
The employee must undergo a return-to-duty alcohol test with a result indicating
an alcohol concentration of less than 0.02 or, if the Prohibited Conduct
involved a controlled substance, a return-to-duty controlled substance test
with a result indicating a verified negative result for controlled substance
use.
|
|
| 6. |
Follow-Up Testing
Following a determination by a Substance Abuse Professional that a Covered
Employee is in need of assistance in resolving problems associated with alcohol
misuse and/or use of controlled substances, the Covered Employee is subject
to unannounced follow-up alcohol and/or controlled substance testing. The
number and frequency of the tests will be determined by the Substance Abuse
Professional, but will consist of at least six tests in the first twelve
months following the employee's return to duty and may continue for up to
five years. Follow up testing for alcohol may only be conducted while the
employee is performing a safety-sensitive function, just before the employee
is to perform a safety-sensitive function, or just after the employee has
ceased performing such function.
|
|
| E. |
University Notification Obligations
| 1. |
The applicable regional personnel office will:
| a. |
notify a Covered Employee of the results of a pre- employment controlled
substance test if the employee requests such results within 60 calendar days
of being notified of the disposition of the employment application;
|
| b. |
notify a Covered Employee of the results of random, reasonable suspicion
and post-accident tests for controlled substances;
|
| c. |
inform the Covered Employee which controlled substance or substances were
verified as positive;
|
| d. |
make reasonable efforts to contact and request each person who submitted
a specimen under the University's program, regardless of the person's employment
status, to contact and discuss the results of the controlled substances test
with a Medical Review Officer when the Medical Review Officer has been unable
to contact the person and will immediately notify the Medical Review Officer
that the person has been notified to contact the Medical Review Officer within
twenty-four hours;
|
| e. |
provide information on contacting alcohol and/or Substance Abuse Professionals,
counseling and treatment programs; and
|
| f. |
ensure that each Covered Employee receives educational materials that explain
this regulation, the meaning of alcohol and controlled substance misuse,
treatment programs available and alcohol and controlled substance testing
procedures. Covered Employees will acknowledge in writing receipt of such
information.
|
|
| 2. |
Before performing an alcohol or controlled substance test, the trained supervisor
or other trained University official will notify the Covered Employee that
will be tested of the nature of the test and the reasons for the test. The
notice can either be written or oral.
|
|
| F. |
Testing Procedures
| 1. |
Alcohol
Tests will be conducted under the guidance of a Breath Alcohol Technician
selected by the university and in accordance with DOT regulations at one
or more designated testing sites. The site(s) will afford privacy to the
individual being tested. If the result of an initial test is an alcohol
concentration of less than 0.02, no further testing is required and the results
are transmitted to the applicable regional personnel office in a confidential
manner. If the result of an initial test is an alcohol concentration of 0.02
or greater, a confirmation test will be performed within twenty minutes.
The results of an initial test and the confirmation test are printed on the
breath alcohol test forms, signed by both the Breath Alcohol Technician and
the Covered Employee, and transmitted to the applicable regional personnel
office in a confidential manner. Should a breath test show an alcohol
concentration of 0.02 or greater, a blood alcohol test may be offered to
the Covered Employee as an option, although not required.
|
| 2. |
Controlled Substances
DOT regulations require testing for marijuana, cocaine, opiates, amphetamines
and phencyclidine. Tests for these substances will be conducted under the
guidance of the Medical Review Officer selected by the university and in
accordance with DOT regulations at one or more designated collection sites.
Collection of urine samples will allow individual privacy unless there is
a reason to believe that a particular individual may alter or substitute
the specimen. It is a violation of federal law and these regulations to
adulterate or dilute a specimen during the collection procedure.
Test results are given to the Medical Review Officer for analyzing and reporting
to the applicable regional personnel office.
|
|
| G. |
Employee Refusal To Submit to Testing
Any Covered Employee who refuses to submit to a required alcohol or controlled
substance test will be immediately removed from duty and such refusal shall
be treated as a positive test. Failure to provide adequate breath for testing
when required without a valid medical explanation, failure to remain available
for post-accident testing, failure to provide adequate urine for testing
without a valid medical explanation, engaging in conduct that obstructs the
testing process, or failure to sign the alcohol testing form constitutes
a refusal to submit to testing.
|
| H. |
If An Employee Tests Positive
If a Covered Employee has an alcohol concentration of 0.02 or greater in
a confirmation test or tests positive for a controlled substance the employee
is immediately disqualified from performing Safety-Sensitive Functions, including
operating a CMV. The employee will also be subject to return-to-duty testing
and disciplinary action as outlined in these Regulations, and may be subject
to follow-up testing.
|
| I. |
Disciplinary Action
| 1. |
DOT regulations establish prohibited concentrations of alcohol and controlled
substances that may be in a Covered Employee's system while the Covered Employee
is performing a Safety-Sensitive Function and also establish other prohibited
behavior for a Covered Employee. DOT regulations also establish certain minimum
penalties for a Covered Employee who has a test result which exceeds the
prohibited concentration amounts or who has engaged in prohibited behavior.
In general, these penalties include i) prohibitions on driving a CMV for
a period of time following the prohibited behavior (with the length of time
increasing as the number of instances of prohibited behavior increase), ii)
referral to a Substance Abuse Professional, and iii) return to duty and follow
up testing. An employer may, however, adopt stricter penalties.
|
| 2. |
In addition to the minimum penalties established by DOT regulations, the
following disciplinary action will be imposed:
| a. |
Covered Employees who test positive for controlled substances, who refuse
to take a test or whose confirmation test result shows an alcohol concentration
of 0.04 or greater will be considered to have engaged in behavior constituting
grounds for dismissal for cause.
|
| b. |
Covered Employees who engaged in other forms of Prohibited Conduct the first
time will be relieved of duty without pay for the remainder of the employee's
work day and for all of the next scheduled work day. For the second instance
of Prohibited Conduct, the employee will be suspended for forty duty hours
without pay. The third instance of Prohibited Conduct will constitute grounds
for dismissal for cause.
|
| c. |
Other violations of this regulation not described in a. and b. above will
be dealt with in accordance with applicable policies, regulations or procedures.
|
|
| 3. |
The disciplinary action imposed by this section on a Covered Employee shall
be in addition to any other penalties that may be imposed for violations
of state or federal laws or regulations pertaining to drivers of CMV's or
holders of CDL's.
|
|
| J. |
Access to Test Results
Except as required by law, no information about specific alcohol and controlled
substance testing will be released by the University to outside parties.
A Covered Employee is entitled, upon written request, to obtain copies of
any records pertaining to the employee's use of alcohol or controlled substances,
including any records pertaining to the employee's alcohol or controlled
substances tests.
|
| K. |
Records Retention
The applicable regional personnel office will maintain the following records
in a secure location with controlled access:
| 1. |
Five year record retention: Records of any employee alcohol test results
indicating an alcohol concentration of 0.02 or greater; documentation of
refusals to take required alcohol or controlled substance tests; verified
positive controlled substance test results; equipment calibration documentation;
documentation of Covered Employee evaluations and referrals; and a copy of
the calendar year summary required by DOT regulations.
|
| 2. |
Two year record retention: Records related to the collection process and
training.
|
| 3. |
One year record retention: Records of any negative and canceled controlled
substance test results and alcohol tests results with a concentration of
less than 0.02.
The Statewide Office of Human Resources will provide the regional personnel
offices with a summary of additional records required to be maintained by
DOT regulations. The regional personnel offices will be responsible for
maintaining the additional records.
|
|
| L. |
Training
All supervisors of Covered Employees and other university officials designated
by the applicable chancellor to make reasonable suspicion observations will
receive at least 60 minutes of training on alcohol misuse and an additional
60 minutes of training on controlled substance use to assist them in determining
whether reasonable suspicion exists to require an employee to undergo testing.
The training will cover the physical, behavioral, speech and performance
indicators of probable alcohol misuse and use of controlled substances. It
will also cover available methods of intervening when an alcohol or a controlled
substances problem is suspected, including confrontation, referral to the
Employee Assistance Program and/or referral to a higher management authority.
|
| M. |
Self Reporting
A Covered Employee who self reports alcohol misuse or controlled substance
use and requests University assistance will be immediately referred for treatment
to a Substance Abuse Professional. Within 10 working days, the employee must
provide proof to the employee's supervisor of having undergone assessment
screening. The proof must contain the treatment recommendations of the Substance
Abuse Professional. At least monthly, the employee shall furnish the supervisor
with proof of their continuing participation in the recommended treatment
program until completed. Reoccurences of alcohol misuse or controlled substance
use shall be subject to disciplinary action.
|